Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Alwies

Pages: 1 [2] 3
16
Issues & Enquiries / Re: A warning for editing my own post?
« on: February 08, 2017, 11:13:56 »
If you arent allowed to edit / change the settings on something, you shouldn't have access to them. Wasnt it Alwies who told me that?

I did say that, but it isn't relevant here.
Because we do want people to be able to edit their post(s).
But rules about what can be written on this forum do apply. It doesn't matter where the post originated from. If it's a new post, an edited one or one that appeared by magic it just doesn't matter if the content is against the rules.

So if I understood Bez, I'd say you didn't get a warning for editing your own post. As that would suggest the edit part was the fault, where in reality the (new) content of the post was the issue.



17
Issues & Enquiries / Re: Report progress
« on: February 04, 2017, 14:45:27 »
And i would believe that those warnings are still out of control ?

You're making assumptions than judging admins based on those.

Also following the rules strictly still involves admin judgement, as rules are no where near perfect enough to rule that out.
So you can't really say your findings that some messages are not acceptabel as a manner of fact.


There seems to be a trend that people take (cheap) shots at admins, they have no support, proof or sometimes even good reasoning. Just their own opinion which is generally highly valued by default.
Admins are being way to nice by continuously explaining unfounded accusations. Especially as they just keep on coming.
I'd say give Lokar a final answer on whether those logs will be revealed or not and calling it a day.

18
Issues & Enquiries / Re: Election Audit
« on: January 22, 2017, 12:23:11 »

Your logic does not surprise me at all Alwies.

After all, you were in dF, one of the original trademark guilds who would run past a flipping objective instead of defending it.

Oh poor you, other people not defending. Want a tissue?

19
Issues & Enquiries / Re: Election Audit
« on: January 22, 2017, 11:55:59 »
MAC and hardware/physical address are not the same thing.

Geesh Alwies, you should know this.

The one is from your network adapter and the other is from your physical hardware - HDD or mainboard.

Here you go:
http://whatismyipaddress.com/mac-address
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MAC_address
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27016868/what-is-the-difference-between-a-physical-address-and-mac-address-in-networking
http://sites.allegheny.edu/its/residence-hall-network-and-services/computer-adapter-address/

Really curious how the HDD got in there? I've got 2 :P how does that work?
Also isn't a network adapter physical hardware?


20
Issues & Enquiries / Re: Election Audit
« on: January 22, 2017, 11:39:26 »
Dansker, as technical admin, can you confirm whether there IP, MAC and hardware address checks to determined unique and distinct voters?

In other words, is it possible for a single person to use more than one verified account to vote with?

First of all in your sentence MAC and physical adres are the same thing.
While MAC can be found out someways, it's way harder than finding out the IP(for an website) and I believe requires actions from the user for the website to even be able to do it. I'd bet on it that FSP doesn't log them.

IP's are logged, if there where 10 identical ones i think Dansker would have noticed. Can't do much against VPNs.

That all being said if someone or even multiple people spend at least 3 years preparing for something like this and buying HoT 47 times, well they fucking deserve to win the election. I know they would get my vote, I mean they/he/she already spend 5 times the effort that an admin normally does in 3 months.
Yes it's very possible a few select people could have theoretically voted multiple times, but not nearly enough to even make any difference at all.

So to answer your question, yes it is possible. But it's about as likely as me having hacked all the accounts from everyone in this thread and having a discussion with myself.

PS. If i made a mistake forgive me, I'm not as good as Dansker.
PPS. Really if I where to rig an election I'd just ask 50 guildies to vote, perhaps give them a bit of gold. Way way, way more easy and reliable than what your suggesting.

21
Issues & Enquiries / Re: Election Audit
« on: January 21, 2017, 12:32:18 »
Well yea but for the admins to work and investigate this they might want a reason.
A claim by an individual without supporting evidence might just simply not be enough.

Though I can't speak for them.

22
Issues & Enquiries / Re: Election Audit
« on: January 21, 2017, 12:21:48 »
Thank you for your analysis and input Alwies.

I am not saying that accounts were created during this past week.

People have been creating additional accounts and leveling characters 1.5 years ago when the game went free to play, and even before that some people acquired additional accounts when promotions were offered.

Fair enough.
Though in all honesty it's less work convincing 20 people to vote for you than it's to register 20 emails, 20 gw2 accounts, 20 access requests, spreading them out so it's hard be to noticed and not to mention possible ways to evade your IP giving you away.


Any accusation that's based on suspicion only is very hard to disprove as there's no evidence to discredit.
In "the real world" it's required to prevent evidence to avoid this issue and give your claim value.

Otherwise I could for example claim Captain Kirk from the starship Enterprise beamed in and stole my money. No one can really disprove it completely, they can only address the likelihood of my claim being possible. While it's a way more ridiculous version the point remains accurate.


 

23
Issues & Enquiries / Re: Election Audit
« on: January 21, 2017, 12:05:07 »
I am still waiting for evidence that the results are legit and that you didn't go vote with your 20 free accounts.

Well if I take the week when the election was running and just for fun let's include the week before as wel.
The memberlist shows 23 new users.
Of those 23 only 11 have access to the section the poll was in.
One of those 11 hasn't logged in since before the election started.
Leaving 10 people.

If we take another week making it 3 weeks total, you can count one more user making it 11.

So even if we where to assume all of them are the same person trying to rig the election (and we have absolutely no evidence this is the case) they still couldn't have made a difference in who becomes admin as the difference between 3rd and 4th is 18 votes.

This information is gathered from the memberlist, I'm not entirely sure if this is public or not (as I have acces to some hidden section as per my role in helping with TS). That said any admin and moderator can easily verify this.
Here is the link: https://farshiverpeaks.com/index.php?action=mlist
As I said not everyone might have the required permissions.
I haven't included a screen as in case it's hidden that's not my place to do.

24
Issues & Enquiries / Re: Election Audit
« on: January 21, 2017, 10:52:19 »
I'm pretty sure the API verification system forces every vote to be linked to a single non-duplicated gw2 account. So it'd be impossible to create 40 accounts and vote with them, you can spam the public sections with those 40 accounts though.

Stats can be found here: https://farshiverpeaks.com/index.php?action=stats
They can't prove no abuse happened, but they do prove activity on this forum is more than sufficient for the number of votes.

Wanna prove cheating is an possibility, just create a poll and record yourself giving 50 votes to a single option.

25
Smacktalk! / It's coming!
« on: November 15, 2014, 02:04:05 »
Has been a good week, thanks to all the FSP guilds who fought us  (Kale <3 ).
Our apologies for the pug's we had sometimes (deso community < FSP community ), believe me when i say we liked them less than you did.

Having been on desolation i only appreciate the great community FSP has more. See you guys around :) <3.

26
Smacktalk! / It's coming!
« on: November 09, 2014, 23:46:15 »
Guess it happens on every server, still sucks though.

27
Smacktalk! / It's coming!
« on: November 09, 2014, 22:28:59 »
As said here: http://www.gw2wvw.net/comment/86205#comment-86205 by hihey54
Quote
...and of course, when we're not facing SFR, all the retarded PVErs come out of their cave to make big queues every day lol.
This server is beyond retarded



Sorry guys :(

28
Smacktalk! / It's coming!
« on: November 09, 2014, 17:13:05 »
I didn't die yesterday B)
Will watch out for you xerion!

Looking forward to tonight should be a lot of guilds around.

29
Smacktalk! / It's coming!
« on: November 09, 2014, 13:15:49 »
We generally prefer the 69 + pugs meta.
I will be happy to disagree with you there.

30
Smacktalk! / It's coming!
« on: November 09, 2014, 11:57:32 »
@Beast
and i wish you where there to blob me <3

@wanted
Again really i never said deso doesn't have massive blobs stop trying to convince me of something i know.
"massive blob" is a term different based upon perspective, stop trying to make it concrete just so you can use it as an argument.

I'll make sure to add/remove a few of our numbers to satisfy your needs ;).

EDIT: please read my comment as it is written we opened our event because of superior numbers and in the end we had superior numbers. I still think FSP is the better server in quite nearly everything besides possibly  numbers and coverage.

Pages: 1 [2] 3